Utility & Prospect & Decision Theories
Metadata
News   Events   Reviews   Analysis


Utility (& Prospect & Decision Theories)  
Metadata
(refereed articles mainly)
See also Utility items

Contents   (in new windows)

1.   News
2.   Events
  (2009 December   November   October   September   August   July   June   May   April   March   February   January  
2008 Undated   2007 Undated )
3.   Utility Problems
(St. Petersburg Paradox Allais Paradox   Equity Premium Puzzle   Risk Aversion   Gains and Losses   Loss Aversion Overweighting of low Probabilities   Underweighting of high Probabilities "Four-Fold-Pattern"   Shape of Probability Weighting Function   Ellsberg Paradox   Preference Reversals )
4.   New Approach.   Principle of Uncertain Future
5.   Solution of Problems
(of St. Petersburg Paradox   of Allais Paradox   of Equity Premium Puzzle   of Risk Aversion   of Gains and Losses   of Loss Aversion   of Overweighting of low Probabilities   of Underweighting of high Probabilities of "Four-Fold-Pattern"   of Shape of Probability Weighting Function   of Ellsberg Paradox   of Preference Reversals )


------------------------------------------------------------------------

Utility & Prospect & Decision Theories   Metadata  
1. News

Thermoeconomics - A Thermodynamic Approach to Economics
John Bryant
Books from Economic Consultancy, Vocat Internation...     2009
Abstract

Measuring the Output and Prices of the Lottery Sector:
An Application of Implicit Expected Utility Theory

Kam Yu
NBER Chapters from National Bureau of Economic Res...     2009
Abstract

The shape of the utility function under risk
in the loss domain and the "ruinous losses" hypothesis:
some experimental results

Nathalie Etchart-Vincent
Economics Bulletin     2009
Abstract

A simple test for the violation of the non-satiation axiom
under uncertainty: The theory

Robert Sproule and Calin Valsan
Economics Bulletin     2009
Abstract

The origin of utility: Sexual selection and conspicuous consumption
Gianni De Fraja
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization     2009
Abstract

Integration of VaR and expected utility
under departures from normality

Peter J. Barry, Bruce J. Sherrick and Jianmei Zhao
Agricultural Economics     2009
Abstract

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Utility & Prospect & Decision Theories   Metadata
2. Events
See also   New Economics Papers
nep-upt   Utility Models & Prospect Theory
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008
Top
Metadata added/revised in December

Thermoeconomics - A Thermodynamic Approach to Economics
John Bryant
Books from Economic Consultancy, Vocat Internation...     2009
Abstract

Comparison of Mean-Variance Theory and
Expected-Utility Theory through a Laboratory Experiment

Andrea Morone
Economics Bulletin     2008
Abstract

Measuring the Output and Prices of the Lottery Sector:
An Application of Implicit Expected Utility Theory

Kam Yu
NBER Chapters from National Bureau of Economic Res...     2009
Abstract

The shape of the utility function under risk
in the loss domain and the "ruinous losses" hypothesis:
some experimental results

Nathalie Etchart-Vincent
Economics Bulletin     2009
Abstract

A simple test for the violation of the non-satiation axiom
under uncertainty: The theory

Robert Sproule and Calin Valsan
Economics Bulletin     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in November

A Note on Utility Maximization with Unbounded Random Endowment
Keita Owari
Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi Unive...     2009-10
Abstract

The origin of utility: Sexual selection and conspicuous consumption
Gianni De Fraja
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization     2009
Abstract

A Reexamination of the Relationship between Preferences
and Moment Orderings by Rational Risk Averse Investors

P. L. Brockett and J. R. Garven
Risk and Insurance Archive     2009
Abstract

Integration of VaR and expected utility
under departures from normality

Peter J. Barry, Bruce J. Sherrick and Jianmei Zhao
Agricultural Economics     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in October

How Sapient is Homo Economicus?
The Evolutionary Origins of Trade,
Ethics and Economic Rationality

Kaushik Basu
esocialsciences.com     2009
Abstract

Robust Exponential Hedging in a Brownian Setting
Keita Owari
Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi Unive...     2009-09
Abstract

Utility-Based Utility
David Cass
Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department o...     2008
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in September

Distortion of probability and outcome information
in risky decisions

Michael L. DeKay, Patino-Echeverri, Dalia and Paul S. Fischbeck
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process...     2009
Abstract

When is there state independence?
Brian Hill
Journal of Economic Theory     2009
Abstract

Parametric weighting functions
Enrico Diecidue, Ulrich Schmidt and Horst Zank
Journal of Economic Theory     2009
Abstract

Elementary non-Archimedean utility theory
Frederik S. Herzberg
Mathematical Social Sciences     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in August

Utility Maximization with a Stochastic Clock
and an Unbounded Random Endowment

Gordan Zitkovic
arXiv.org     2007
Abstract

Utility function estimation: the entropy approach
Andreia Dionisio and A. Heitor Reis
arXiv.org     2007
Abstract

Utility Maximization in a jump market model
Morlais, Marie-Amelie
arXiv.org     2008
Abstract


Top
Metadata added/revised in July

Decision Making and Trade without Probabilities
Jack Douglas Stecher, Radhika Lunawat, Kira Pronin
and John DIckhaut
CIRANO     2007
Abstract

Expected utility versus the changes in knowledge ahead
Robin Pope, Johannes Leitner and Leopold-Wildburger, Ulrike
European Journal of Operational Research     2009
Abstract

On the futility of criticizing Simon?s rational choice model
Gustavo Marques and Diego Weisman
Economia     2008
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in June

A CLOSER LOOK AT UTILITY MAXIMISED BY ECONOMIC AGENTS
Michal Skorepa
Politicka ekonomie     2008
Abstract

Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation
Marciano Siniscalchi
Econometrica     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in May

THE UTILITY OF THE CONSUMER FROM THE ANCIENTS TO THE CLASSICS
Cristina Gabriela ZAMFIR and Gabriela VIRLAN
EuroEconomica     2009
Abstract

Evolution of Time Preferences and Attitudes Towards Risk
Nick Netzer
Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universitat Konstan...     2008
Abstract

Spatial choice: a matter of utility or regret?
Caspar G Chorus, Theo A Arentze and Harry J P Timmermans
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in April

A Parametric Analysis of Prospect Theory's Functionals
for the General Population

Adam S. Booij, Bernard M.S. van Praag and Gijs Van De Kuilen
CESifo GmbH     2009
Abstract     Text

Testing expected utility maximization
under price and quantity risk with a heterogeneous panel

Yucan Liu and C. Richard Shumway
Applied Economics     2009
Abstract

A simple model of cumulative prospect theory
Ulrich Schmidt and Horst Zank
Journal of Mathematical Economics     2009
Abstract

A More General Non-expected Utility Model
as an Explanation of Gambling Outcomes
for Individuals and Markets

David Peel and David Law
Economica     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in March

Nozick, Ramsey, and Symbolic Utility
Wesley Cooper
Utilitas     2008
Abstract

Comparing Fuzzy and Probabilistic Approaches
to Preference Uncertainty in Non-Market Valuation

Lili Sun and G. Kooten
Environmental & Resource Economics     2009
Title

Pricing jump risk with utility indifference
Lixin Wu and Min Dai
Quantitative Finance     2009
Abstract

Investment strategies in the long run
with proportional transaction costs and a HARA utility function

Petr Dostal
Quantitative Finance     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in February

Would a risk-averse newsvendor order less at a higher selling price?
Charles X. Wang, Scott Webster and Nallan C. Suresh
European Journal of Operational Research     2009
Abstract

Risk-averse order policies with random prices
in complete market and retailers' private information

Charles S. Tapiero and Konstantin Kogan
European Journal of Operational Research     2009
Abstract

Dominance among alternatives in random utility models
Ennio Cascetta and Andrea Papola
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practic...     2009
Abstract

Top
Metadata added/revised in January

Decentralized trade, random utility
and the evolution of social welfare

Michihiro Kandori, Roberto Serrano and Oscar Volij
Journal of Economic Theory     2008
Abstract

An axiomatic account of status quo-dependent non-expected utility:
Pragmatic constraints on rational choice under risk

Gebhard Geiger
Mathematical Social Sciences     2008
Abstract

A reformulation of the maxmin expected utility model
with application to agency theory

Edi Karni
Journal of Mathematical Economics     2009
Abstract

Debreu-like properties of utility representations
A. Caserta, A. Giarlotta and S. Watson
Journal of Mathematical Economics     2008
Abstract

Stochastic utility theorem
Pavlo R. Blavatskyy
Journal of Mathematical Economics     2008
Abstract

Something for nothing: A model of gambling behavior
John Nyman, John W. Welte and Bryan E. Dowd
The Journal of Socio-Economics     2008
Abstract

Top
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Metadata added/revised in 2008 Undated

Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family
Peter P. Wakker
Health Economics     2008
Abstract

Asymmetric or symmetric time preference and discounting
in many facets of economic theory: A miscellany

Paul Samuelson
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty     2008
Title

A Geometric Measure for the Violation of Utility Maximization
Jan Heufer
Rheinisch-Westfalisches Institut fur Wirtschaftsfo...     2008-09
Abstract     Text

Ranking completely uncertain decisions
by the uniform expected utility criterion

Nicolas Gravel, Thierry Marchant and Arunava Sen
Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, Fr...     2007-07
Abstract     Text

Calibration Results for Non-Expected Utility Theories
Zvi Safra and Uzi Segal
Econometrica     2008
Abstract

How can a psychologist inform economics?
The strange case of Sidney Siegel

Alessandro Innocenti
Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Develop...     2008-07
Abstract

An Experimental Investigation of Alternatives
to Expected Utility Using Pricing Data

Andrea Morone and Ulrich Schmidt
Economics Bulletin     2008
Abstract     Text

A new approach to modeling decision-making under uncertainty
Edi Karni
Economic Theory     2007
Title

A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion
under prospect theory

Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt and Olivier L’Haridon
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty     2008
Title

Utility of gambling II: risk, paradoxes, and data
R. Luce, C. Ng, A. Marley and Janos Aczel
Economic Theory     2008
Title

Walrasian Solutions Without Utility Functions
C-Rene Dominique
University Library of Munich, Germany     2008
Abstract     Text

Non-classical expected utility theory
with application to type indeterminacy

Vladimir I. Danilov and Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky
PSE (Ecole normale superieure)     2007
Abstract     Text

Decision Making and Trade without Probabilities
Jack Douglas Stecher, Radhika Lunawat, Kira Pronin and John Dickhaut
CIRANO     2007-10
Abstract     Text

Expected utility inequalities: theory and applications
Eduardo Zambrano
Economic Theory     2008
Title

Economics is philosophy, economics is not science
Rupert Read
International Journal of Green Economics     2007
Abstract

Relativity, Rank and the Utility of Income
Matthew D. Rablen
Economic Journal     2008
Abstract

Great Expectations. Part I:
On the Customizability of Generalized Expected Utility

Francis Chu and Joseph Halpern
Theory and Decision     2008
Title

On Ordinal Utility, Cardinal Utility and Random Utility
Richard Batley
Theory and Decision     2008
Title

Risk preferences and changes in background risk
Donald Keenan, Donald Rudow and Arthur Snow
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty     2008
Title

Generalized expected utility, heteroscedastic error,
and path dependence in risky choice

David Buschena and David Zilberman
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty     2008
Title

Utility function of fuzzy preferences on a countable set
under max-*-transitivity

Louis Fono and Nicolas Andjiga
Social Choice and Welfare     2007
Title

ANTICIPATED UTILITY AND RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS
AS APPROXIMATIONS OF BAYESIAN DECISION MAKING

Timothy Cogley and Thomas Sargent
International Economic Review     2008
Abstract

A Model of Utility Smoothing
Katsutoshi Wakai
Econometrica     2008
Abstract

Interpretations Of Utility And Their Implications For The Valuation Of Health
Paul Dolan and Daniel Kahneman
Economic Journal     2008
Abstract

Top
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Metadata added/revised in 2007 Undated

Non-classical expected utility theory
with application to type indeterminacy

Vladimir I. Danilov and Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky
PSE (Ecole normale superieure)     2007
Abstract     Text

Comparison of Mean-Variance Theory and Expected-Utility Theory
through a Laboratory Experiment

Andrea Morone
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche - Universita di...     2007-10
Abstract     Text

Institutions for Intuitive Man
Engel Christoph
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Go...     2007-08
Abstract     Text

Parametric Weighting Functions
Enrico Diecidue, Ulrich Schmidt and Horst Zank
Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department...     2007
Abstract     Text

An Experimental Investigation of Alternatives
to Expected Utility Using Pricing Data

Andrea Morone and Ulrich Schmidt
Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department...     2006
Abstract     Text

Risk Aversion, Wealth, and Background Risk
Luigi Guiso and Monica Paiella
European University Institute     2007
Abstract     Text

What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function?
Fehr-Duda, Helga, Marc Schurer and Renate Schubert
CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at...     2006
Abstract     Text

Explaining the anomalies of the exponential discounted utility model
Ali al-Nowaihi and Sanjit Dhami
Department of Economics, University of Leicester     2007-09
Abstract     Text

Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon
David J. Butler and Graham C. Loomes
American Economic Review    2007
Abstract
About: "... any successful descriptive theory
of choice and valuation will need to allow in some way for the
imprecision ..."



A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion
Raj Chetty
American Economic Review     2006
Abstract

Prospect-theory’s Diminishing Sensitivity
Versus Economics’ Intrinsic Utility of Money:
How the Introduction of the Euro can be Used
to Disentangle the Two Empirically

Peter Wakker, Veronika Kobberling and Christiane Schwieren
Theory and Decision     2007
Abstract

Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration exercise
Laura Schechter
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty   2007
Abstract

Valuing A Risky Prospect Less Than Its Worst Outcome:
Uncertainty Effect or Task Ambiguity?

Andreas Ortmann, Alexandra Prokosheva, Ondrej Rydval and Ralph Hertwig
Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Planck-Ins...   2007-07-18
Abstract     Text

The Origin of Utility
Gianni De Fraja
C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers   2006
Abstract

Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation
Daniel Kahneman and Robert Sugden
Environmental & Resource Economics   2005
Abstract

The Behavioralist Meets the Market:
Measuring Social Preferences and Reputation Effects
in Actual Transactions

John A. List
Journal of Political Economy   2006
Abstract     Text of the corresponding Working Paper

On the Paradigm of Loss Aversion
Horst Zank
School of Economics, The University of Manchester   2007
Title

Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion
Daniel Kahneman, Alan Krueger, David Schkade, Norbert Schwarz and Arthur Stone
Princeton University, Department of Economics, Cen...   2006
Abstract     Text


Top
------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Utility Problems & Paradoxes (more)
The Allais paradox (modified)

Suppose Mr. Somebody offers you a choice of only one of the following:
A guaranteed gain of $99.
Or
A lottery:
The gain of $100 with the probability P(preliminary) = 99%
or
$0 with the (preliminary) probability 1%.

The mathematical expectations of guarantee and lottery outcomes are exactly the same. But people chose the guaranteed gain instead of the lottery.


Top
Gains and Losses

Compare two experiments:

1) Mr. Somebody offers you a choice of only one of the following:
A guaranteed gain of $99.
Or
A lottery:
The gain of $100 with the probability P(preliminary) = 99%
or
$0 with the (preliminary) probability 1%.


2) Mr. Somebody offers you a choice of only one of the following:
A guaranteed loss of $99.
Or
A lottery:
The loss of $100 with the probability P(preliminary) = 99%
or
$0 with the (preliminary) probability 1%.


The mathematical expectations of the guarantee and lottery outcomes are exactly the same in both experiments. But in similar experiments, the overwhelming majority of people chose:
- in the case of gains - the guaranteed gain instead of the lottery one.
- in the case of losses - the lottery loss instead of the guaranteed one.
The possible well-known "natural and clear explanation" of gains in the Allais paradox by means of risk aversion cannot supply any uniform explanation for both gains and losses. The result of this explanation is gains' risk aversion and losses' risk seeking.


Top
Overweighting of low Probabilities

Suppose Mr. Somebody offers you a choice of only one of the following:
A guaranteed gain of $1.
Or
A lottery:
The gain of $100 with the probability P(preliminary) = 1%
or
$0 with the (preliminary) probability 1%.

The mathematical expectations of guarantee and lottery outcomes are exactly the same. But the well-determined experimental fact is: in similar experiments the obvious majority of people chose the lottery instead of the guaranteed gain.


Four-Fold-Pattern

The well-determined facts are:
For positive (gains) risky prospects, people typically
        1) overweight low probabilities but
        2) underweight high probabilities.
For negative (losses) risky prospects, people typically
        3) underweight low probabilities but
        4) overweight high probabilities.
Top
------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. New Approach (more)    
The idea of the approach

Particular consideration of (hidden) uncertainties
(noises, fluctuations, measurements' errors, imprecision, etc.)

Principle of Uncertain Future
(simplified as much as possible)
The principle

The probability of a future event contains uncertainty.

4.1. The first consequence of the principle

Suppose we plan to test the probability value, which is equal to 99%.
Suppose the probability uncertainty value is equal to 5%.
Then, evidently, the real mean value of probability cannot be as high as 99%.
Generally,
High probabilities will decrease.
Phigh real < Phigh planned
Analogously, but considering the second consequence of the principle (see below),
Low probabilities can increase.
Plow real possible > Plow planned

4.2. The second consequence of the principle

The total probability of unforeseen future events
is more than 0%

Σ Punforeseen real > 0%
Hence,
The present total probability of future events
is less than 100%

Σ Pplanned < 100%
or
The present probability system of future events
is incomplete.


Top
------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Solution of Problems (more)    

The strongest qualitative test is the 4-Fold-Pattern.

Solution & Explanation
of the 4-Fold-Pattern
(simplified as much as possible)

The well-determined facts are:
For positive (gains) risky prospects, people typically
        1) overweight low probabilities but
        2) underweight high probabilities.
For negative (losses) risky prospects, people typically
        3) underweight low probabilities but
        4) overweight high probabilities.

Denoting the real value of probability,
which value is near 100% as Phigh real ,
the (positive) value of gain as G
and the (negative) value of loss as -G ,
we obtain
Phigh real < Phigh planned

and
G * Phigh real < G * Phigh planned

-G * Phigh real > -G * Phigh planned

        2) the underweight of high probabilities gains and
        4) the overweight of high probabilities losses.
Denoting the real value of probability,
which value is near 0% as Plow real possible
we obtain
Plow real possible > Plow planned

and
G * Plow real possible > G * Plow planned

-G * Plow real possible < -G * Plow planned

        1) the overweight of low probabilities gains and
        3) the underweight of low probabilities losses.
Thus, the above facts can be explained naturally and uniformly.


Top



Copyright ® Alexander Harin       Создание сайта, разработка сайта Яндекс цитирования
HotLog online dating service
HotLog
HotLog